
Do boys and girls view competition in different ways?
by Mary Healy Jonas, Melpomene Research Director
Over the years, the Melpomene Institute has frequently received questions from coaches, parents, the media and others about boys and girls and how/if they participate in sports differently. As we searched for answers to their questions, we came to discover that there wasn’t much out there in the way of research about this topic. Therefore, early in 2000, we decided to explore this question ourselves, to develop a questionnaire that would give us an overview of where young male and female athletes fell along the spectrum of attitudes and behaviours towards competition and to find out if they were different from each other. The following is an abbreviated report highlighting some telling results.
METHODS
- Questionnaire developed (Summer, 2000) and piloted at the Minnesota Lynx/Minnesota Timberwolves youth basketball camps. Three hundred ninety-nine young athletes completed the questionnaire.
- Questionnaire revised based on lessons learned during the pilot.
- Revised questionnaire distributed to over 1,000 young athletes from across the United States between 11 and 18 years of age at the USA Soccer Cup Tournament in Blaine, MN in July of 2001.
DEMOGRAPHICS
Sample demographics (N = 879)
Gender
Female 557 (63%)
Male 320 (37%)
Racial Background
White 85%
Asian 1.5%
Other 2.5%
Chose not to identify 11%
Age
12 – 13 years 40%
14 – 15 years 31%
16 – 17 years 29%
School district
Suburban 56%
Urban 33%
Rural 7%
Academics
All A’s 40%
A’s & B’s 41%
B’s & C’s 10%
C’s & D’s 2%
Chose not to answer 7%
ANALYSIS
- Cross tabulations were conducted to provide simple descriptive statistics on how boys and girls answered questions differently.
- Nine variables (questions) were identified as “indicating an unhealthy attitude or behavior” towards competition and were combined to create a new variable (see table at right).
- This same procedure was completed to create a new variable focused on “winning” (see table). Ø Correlational analysis was performed on these variables to determine if any relationships existed between them and other key variables in the questionnaire.
- One-sample and independent sample t-tests were run on the two new variables to determine where boys and girls fell compared to the overall sample mean and how boys and girls compared to each other.
Variables included in the “unhealthy” variable
- I would do anything to win
- The main goal of playing sports is to win
- It is more important for key players to play in order to win than for everyone to get equal playing time
- I dislike my opponents
- I get very upset when my team loses
- Winning makes me feel powerful as a person
- I have a hard time forgetting a loss
How important is:
- winning
- scoring a goal
Variables included in the “winning” variable
- I would do anything to win
- The main goal of playing sports is to win
- It is more important for key players to play in order to win than for everyone to get equal playing time
How important is:
- winning
RESULTS
Descriptive Results
As the chart below shows, the reasons that boys and girls gave for why they play soccer are virtually identical:
“I play soccer because I want to…”
| Girls | Boys | |
| have fun | 99% | 94% |
| improve at my sport | 98% | 94% |
| learn new skills | 95% | 89% |
| be competitive | 94% | 94% |
| be in shape | 92% | 88% |
| be with friends | 92% | 87% |
| keep busy | 73% | 63% |
| get into a good college | 57% | 69% |
Even as the motivation to play was the same, some notable differences were found in the attitudes and behaviors of boys and girls.
The following are a few of the differences between the way boys and girls answered specific questions probing attitudes towards winning.
The far right column gives the total percentage of boys and girls answering “frequently” or “almost always.”
“I would do almost anything to win”
| Almost never |
Occasionally | Sometimes | Frequently | Almost always | Frequently + Almost Always | |
| Female | 20% | 23% | 27% | 15% | 14% | 29% |
| Male | 11% | 15% | 26% | 20% | 29% | 49% |
“It is more important for key players to play in order to win than for everyone to get equal playing time”
| Almost never |
Occasionally | Sometimes | Frequently | Almost always | Frequently + Almost Always | |
| Female | 25% | 21% | 30% | 14% | 10% | 24% |
| Male | 11% | 12% | 36% | 21% | 21% | 42% |
“I get very upset when my team loses”
| Almost never |
Occasionally | Sometimes | Frequently | Almost always | Frequently + Almost Always | |
| Female | 21% | 28% | 33% | 10% | 8% | 18% |
| Male | 10% | 23% | 26% | 21% | 21% | 42% |
Unhealthy attitudes towards competition
The difference noted in the above section compelled us to ask ourselves: “so what?” What does it mean that boys and girls differed in these areas? We decided to look at the numbers from the vantage point of competition as being made up of a range of behaviors and attitudes, some of which are healthy and some that are unhealthy.
- A scale measurement was created for the new “unhealthy” variable, with 36 representing the threshold over which an athlete would be considered unhealthy (for a more in depth explanation of this process consult the final report in the upcoming Summer 2002 Melpomene Journal).
- One-sample t-tests were conducted to compare the overall sample of kids with this unhealthy threshold of 36.
- The sample mean score on unhealthy is 27.85, which is significantly lower than the unhealthy threshold of 36 (P<.001), indicating that the sample as a whole is not particularly unhealthy. One hundred three cases fall above 36, thus in the unhealthy range. Thirty of these are female (29%) and 73 are male (71%).
- As with the unhealthy variable, variables from the survey indicating a strong focus on winning were combined to create a new “winning” variable. The sample mean score for winning is 12.77.
The age factor
In addition to gender differences, we anticipated that differences might be evident between the younger and older participants. The following few statistics show the differences in answers between the younger and older participants on a few key variables*.
| 12-13 years | 16-17 years | |
| “I would do almost anything to win” | 33% | 45% |
| “The main goal of playing sports is to win” | 19% | 34% |
| “Is important that everyone gets a chance to play” | 66% | 25% |
* the percentage reflect those answering “frequently” or “almost always” to the questions.
Pressure towards competition When asked if they felt pressure to be competitive, 43% of the athletes responded affirmatively (42% of the girls and 46% of the boys). Of those who listed sources for the pressure, the following is the breakdown of where these kids feel the pressure is coming from:
- 26% coaches
- 18% teammates
- 25% parents
- 8% peers
- 20% myself
- 2% fans
Of the 125 athletes who fall into the unhealthy range of the sample, 58% respond affirmatively to the pressure question (73% of the girls and 52% of the boys), however, the breakdown of the sources of that pressure is almost identical to the whole sample.
DISCUSSION
The findings from the study offer compelling insights into kids who play sports — their motivations and their feelings towards competition. Further, it raises more questions about these very same topics. The final report in the Melpomene Journal will address the following questions raised by the findings:
- What might it mean that kids seem to adopt more unhealthy attitudes and behaviors as they age? Further, why does this coincide with the decline in healthier attitudes such as “fair play?”
- The findings show kids who appear to be quite healthy in their approach to competition. If this is the case, why do we seem to read/hear so much negative press regarding violence and verbal improprieties among youth in sports?
- Are there any correlation between the kids’ attitudes and behaviors and that of their coaches?
- Are there any differences between the coaching styles of men and women coaches?
Coaching U8 soccer players
It is the dream of every inexperienced coach to have a manual handed to him or her with all the answers to their problems. This coaching manual does have a section which includes simple drills and games for your practices, but it is intended to make you think, and understand exactly what you are getting into. We will therefore start with a list of characteristics of U8 football (soccer) players.
They are:
- Still self-focused and individualistic (me, mine, my) but many are willing to share.
- Able to pay attention a bit longer than U-6 players but still not the same as the “competitive” stage.
- Still very honest but most will tell a “white lie” on things that are embarrassing, they cannot do, or they haven’t done. For instance if you ask them at practice, kids did you practice at home this week? They will all scream back yeeeaaahhh. But if you ask them again and make eye contact to one in particular, they will tell you the truth.
- Easily bruised psychologically. They will remember negative comments for a long time! Praise often. Give “hints”, don’t criticize.
- Inclined towards small group activities.
- Always in motion: scratching; blinking; jerking; rocking. Hand-eye coordination is better, while most will still struggle with eye-foot coordination. Note that this is the exact opposite of children in Italy (for instance) where you will find few U-8 kids who can dribble a basketball yet most of them can begin to juggle a soccer ball.
- Starting to imitate older players or sports heroes. Want the same “gear” as them.
- Developing physical confidence. (Most are able to ride a two-wheeler.)
They
- Understand simple rules that are explained briefly and demonstrated.
- Better at recognizing when the ball is out of play, and remembering what goal they are going for… but, in the heat of battle, they will sometimes still forget. They still find it difficult to really be aware of more than one thing at a time.
- Lack sense of pace. They go flat out until they drop.
- Want everybody to like them.
- Respond well to positive reinforcement
- Have limited understanding of personal evaluations. “If they try hard, they performed well” regardless of the actual performance. Thus, they need to be encouraged constantly, and asked “Now, can you do this?”
- Will still want to wear a training bib, even when the colour is identical to their shirt.
And, moreover,
- Skeletal system growing rapidly. Often results in apparent lack of coordination.
- Cardiovascular and temperature regulation system is not developed. Their heart rate peaks quickly and they overheat quickly. make sure that they get adequate water breaks
- If you are not energetic and fun you will easily bore them.
- Respond well to positive reinforcement.
U-8 PARENTS
It is imperative that coaches get the parents involved. Not only are they a major resource for your team, but the U-8 player still views their parents as the most significant people in their lives. A pre-season meeting should be held with the parents so that objectives and team policies can be addressed. Some topics that you may want to address at this meeting are:
- A means of contacting everyone without one person doing all of the calling. (Phone chains and e-mail lists are great).
- Choosing a team administrator-someone to handle all of the details. At the U8 level, the team administrator and fund-raiser should probably be the same person, since the administration job is very simple with so few players.
- Complete all paperwork required by your league or club.
- Discuss the laws of the game.
- Carpool needs and treat list.
- Training and game schedules. How you feel about starting and ending on time, what your attendance expectations are etc.
- What each player should bring to training: inflated ball, filled water bottle, soccer attire, shin guards (Cleats are not mandatory.) Also go over what they should bring to games and when they should arrive.
- Most importantly, your philosophy about coaching U-8 players. Let them know that everyone will have equal playing time; that the game does not look like the older player’s games; that you are there to ensure that their player is safe and has a good time, as well as learn about soccer, that we are hear to have fun, enjoy some fresh air, and make new friends.
- What your expectations for them is during game time. How do you want them to cheer? Do they know that they should not coach from the sidelines? It is hard for many parents to understand that it is best if they do not give specific instructions (e.g., Kick it hard, Johnny!) from the sidelines; now is the time to explain this to them.
- Try your best to get an assistant coach and parent referee lined up. At this level they can be the same person, though it is nice to have more than one parent referee. You can accomplish a lot with a 8:1 player to coach ratio, but you can accomplish a lot MORE with an assistant. Let the assistant know that all he or she has to do is show up and help you out, or let you know in advance he or she won’t be there.
Coaching mentality
“Small sided games, while no guarantee, are the best way to get children interested in soccer…”
“Over and over again during matches and training sessions, situations occur that are suitable for “mental training”. This is because these situations have emotional ballast and it concerns a hobby they enjoy. That and playing in a team make it possible for coaches to tactfully mould talented (and not-so-talented) players” Rinus Michels
Small sided games provide an excellent tool for this “mental training.” In fact this is the biggest element that separates them from football drills and exercises. These are useful for developing technique in a clinical sense and insight in an academic form. Important details for advanced players. Small sided games can also be useful in developing technique and insight into the game but they also add the extra dimension of developing mental qualities in an efficient and effective manner. Taken together this is the most practical way to mould the basics of the game at the earliest possible age.
What is Coaching Mentality?
Enjoyment. The most important consideration is that the practices and games are enjoyable. This is harder then it sounds because in any group what is “enjoyable” is going to be different for everyone involved. This is the hardest job for the youth coach, catering to all of the different demands, expectations and agendas inside of the team. It can create win-lose situations for the coach where he/she appears to favour one person/group over another and usually centres on the disparity between the levels and agendas inside of the team. The bigger the gap the greater the friction, miscommunication and mistrust. The bottom line is, if the players do not enjoy the activity they will not invest much effort in it, and they are the one’s playing the game. The best advice for adults involved in youth soccer is to remember that it is a hobby that centres around playing the game of soccer. When the expectations are anything more or less then this enjoyment for enjoyments sake is jeopardized. Children “perform out of a sense of duty instead of passion” and this base line mentality stifles growth. (It’s interesting to note that the number one reason given for dropping out of the game is “it’s not fun anymore.”)
Hobbies are activities that fill leisure time, are an individual’s choice and can be easily replaced. For most children their introduction to the game is not voluntary. They are signed up to a team and placed in a league before they even know what the game is, let alone if they like it. New coaches find this out quickly. Children come to ‘practice’ and immediately practice on the swings, playing tag or just hanging out with their friends. Usually it takes an adult to call them in and begin the activity. An indication that the children have embraced soccer as a serious hobby is in how quickly they start practice on their own. Children who need 30 minutes of an hour practice simply to take the field are demonstrating their level of commitment to the game. Their interest in the game is low and this is a big problem for any youth coach. If the game doesn’t hold significant appeal it won’t hold their attention. If it won’t hold their attention they’ll be easily distracted. If they’re easily distracted they’ll become interested in other things. These other things can begin to fill their leisure time and soon become their new hobby. Small sided games, while no guarantee, are the best way to get children interested in soccer as a hobby. Essentially, they offer soccer for soccer’s sake and children can get as much out of the game, and invest as much into it, as they like.
Games involve problem solving, competition and a result. These provide motivation, a goal, and feedback. Even a game of solitaire includes all of these elements. A game of soccer includes all of the elements of soccer. So, if the children value soccer as a hobby and they are offered the opportunity to play a soccer game the motivation is intrinsic, the coach doesn’t need to invest any effort in getting the children engaged. It will contain a clear goal and then provide feedback to the children as to how they did. Not only do the children learn about solving the problem but this also reinforces soccer as a hobby creating a positive feedback loop. Playing better soccer is more fun which makes you want to play more soccer which provides more opportunities to play better soccer and so on. This can lead to an individual investing free time and doing homework because they value the activity. Soccer strange activities and games serve a useful purpose after players are engaged in soccer as a hobby. These activities are good for children who can differentiate between the activity and the objective, they are secure in their relationship to the game. When dealing with children who aren’t as committed the best advice is to concentrate on, and offer what is being advertised, playing a game of soccer. Let each individual choose their own level of commitment. Get them into the game before concentrating on the finer points.
Concentration. See the concentration page for some key ideas. In coaching mentality the focus is on lengthening the time that the players can concentrate and the resistance they can work against. While age plays a big role in this, experience is another key factor. Many adult ‘occasional golfers’ can only maintain their concentration for short periods, i.e. the front nine while professionals can play 36 holes a day three days in a row and be as sharp at the end as they were at the beginning. Think of the resistance as the amount of distractions that a player can handle before it interferes with his focus on the task. It’s learning how to minimize or ignore the interference that’s important. (Bring an eight week old puppy to a 10 year olds soccer practice and watch how fast soccer is forgotten.)
Small sided games address both elements in developing concentration. The more children engage in continuous play the longer they can play both physically and mentally. Free form games just keep going, the game never stops for long and this helps to develop ‘mental stamina.’ The best way to increase mental capacity to resist distractions is to decrease the amount of time that players have to think and act. Making the field smaller, having a new ball played in as soon as the ball is out of play, giving players 5 seconds to get the ball back into play are ways to increase the speed of play, therefore the resistance. This helps children to maintain focus, to rapidly determine what is important and what isn’t by not allowing them to simply dwell on things.
Transition. Soccer is a game with two different mind sets. Attacking and defending change rapidly and often yet most youth players only function in one mode or the other. Timing some youth players while they mentally switch gears can require a calendar instead of a stop watch! Drills that only go one way, i.e. dribble and shoot at goal, or technical training, i.e. dribble in a grid and avoid other players, never address this change in mentality, in fact they reinforce the opposite. That the players job is over at the change of possession. To stop playing is acceptable. Considering the amount of time that young players spend in drills like this and it isn’t surprising that speed of thought and play is a big problem in many teams. Small sided soccer games address the change in possession and both ways. They provide abundant opportunities for mental training simply in the run of play. See four main moments.
Fear of failure. The biggest fear of failure is the fear of losing the game. “What if I make THE mistake?” When winning and losing is restricted to game day it takes on even greater significance. There is no middle ground. Practice is meant to prepare the players for the match. When winning and losing has no place in training then arguably the most important element of the game is being neglected, the result. Children need to learn how to deal with both sides of this. That winning or losing today doesn’t mean much tomorrow, that both are necessary for growth. Small sided games end with a result and with several small sided games in any practice every player will have several opportunities to experience both sides. This helps children to lower their fear of failure and leads to a more stable appreciation of what the results really mean.
Styles of play. As children get older they begin to encounter a more sophisticated game. Tactics begin to play a bigger role. The most basic tactical decision is what style the team will adopt, the playmaking or counter attacking style. These styles incorporate different mentalities, they approach the game differently. Even games like 2v2 or 3v3 allow children to learn some of the basic elements of these styles. With early and simplified exposure children can begin to understand how, when and why a particular style is appropriate and what to do in order to use each one. This makes for more adaptable players and helps to prepare them for the more complex levels of soccer.
Child abuse in youth soccer
What is abuse and how do I recognise it?
Physical Abuse
Physical Abuse may involve hitting, shaking, throwing, kicking, punching, pinching, biting, choking, poisoning, burning or scalding, drowning, suffocating or otherwise causing physical harm to a child.
Physical harm may also be caused when a parent or carer feigns the symptoms of, or deliberately causes ill health to a child whom they are looking after. This is commonly described using terms such as Munchausen’s Syndrome by proxy (now known as Fabricated or Induced Illness).
Examples of physical abuse in youth soccer
May be when a child is forced into training and competition that exceeds the capacity of his or her immature or growing body; or where the child is given drugs to enhance performance or delay puberty.
Sexual Abuse
Sexual Abuse involves forcing or enticing a child or young person to take part in sexual activities, whether or not the child is aware of what is happening. The activities may involve physical contact, including penetrative or non-penetrative acts. They may include non-contact activities such as involving children in looking at pornographic material or watching sexual activities, talking to children in a sexually explicit manner or encouraging children to behave in sexually inappropriate ways.
Examples of sexual abuse in youth soccer
May be when a child is forced into training and competition that exceeds the capacity of his or her immature or growing body; or where the child is given drugs to enhance performance or delay puberty.
Emotional Abuse
Emotional abuse is the persistent emotional ill-treatment of a child likely to cause severe and lasting adverse effects on the child’s emotional development.
It may involve conveying to children that they are worthless or unloved, inadequate or valued only insofar as they meet the needs of another person.
It may feature expectations being imposed on children that are inappropriate to their age or stage of development.
It may involve causing a child frequently to feel frightened or in danger through constant shouting, taunting or threatening behaviour.
Some level of emotional abuse is involved in all types of ill-treatment of a child, though it may occur alone.
Examples of emotional abuse in youth soccer
May include subjecting children to constant criticism, name-calling, and sarcasm or bullying. Putting them under consistent pressure to perform to unrealistically high standards is also a form of emotional abuse.
Neglect
Neglect is the persistent failure to meet a child’s basis physical and psychological needs, likely to result in serious impairment of the child’s health or development.
It may involve a parent or carer failing to provide adequate food, shelter and clothing, failing to protect a child from physical harm or danger, or the failure to ensure access to appropriate care or treatment. It may also include neglect of a child’s basic emotional needs such as the refusal to give children love, affection and/or attention, domestic violence or drug/alcohol abuse in the child’s presence.
Examples of neglect in youth soccer
May include not ensuring children are safe; exposing them to undue cold or heat, or exposing them to unnecessary risk of injury.
Bullying
Bullying is abuse and/or intimidation by a person, persons or an organisation against another or others.
Bullying can be psychological, verbal or physical in nature. It involves an imbalance of power in which the powerful attack the powerless, and occurs over time rather than being a single act. Examples of bullying behaviour can include:
Physical physical assault (pushing, kicking, hitting, punching, etc) or threats of violence
Verbal name calling, insulting others, sarcasm, lying about others, spreading malicious rumours or persistent teasing.
Emotional ignoring/excluding, tormenting, ridiculing, deliberately embarrassing or humiliating others, making people feel different or like an outsider
Racist using racial taunts, gestures or racist graffiti.
Sexual unwanted physical contact, abusive comments or homophobic behaviour.
In an NSPCC study, Child Maltreatment in the UK, boys were found to be most likely to experience physical bullying or threats, or have property stolen or damaged. Girls were more likely to be ignored or not spoken to.
Bullying by adults was a less common experience but one in ten young people reported this. Their most common experiences of adult bullying were being deliberately embarrassed or humiliated, being unfairly treated or verbally abused and being ignored or not spoken to.
Examples of bullying in youth soccer
The competitive nature of sport makes it an ideal environment for bullying behaviour.
The bully can be:
A parent who pushes too hard
A coach who adopts a win at all costs philosophy
A player who intimidates other players or officials
An official who places unfair pressure on a person.
A short history of football (soccer)

The International Football Association Board (IFAB) may possess a proud reputation as having preserved the foundations of the game as it enters a third century, but there are still a few things about the way football was once played that might raise a few eyebrows…
1. During the very first international football match between Scotland and England in 1872, players not only wore “knickerbockers” or long pants but bobble hats or caps too. The head dresses were a normal part of the footballing attire at the time and lasted well into the 20th century.
2. Balls were not exactly round when the first club and country matches took place. A pig’s bladder was blown up like a balloon, tied at the ends and placed inside a leather case, affording it an egg shape. The discovery of Indian rubber in the 1860s gave the ball greater roundness.
3. While it is true footballs of yesteryear gained weight in wet conditions, they were in fact lighter than today’s ball. In 1889, the spherical object used had to be between 12-15 ounces (340 – 425 grams) but this increased to 14-16 ounces (397 -454 grams) in 1937.
4. In the FA rules of 1863, there was no mention of a crossbar. As in rugby today, a goal could be scored at any height as long as the ball went between the sticks or posts. A tape was used to close the goal during the first internationals before a crossbar replaced it in 1875.
A 450-year-old football, made from a pig’s bladder and pieces of leather, laced together and found in the rafters of Stirling Castle
5. Mob football, a descendant of the modern game, stormed into England around the 12th Century and caught on to such an extent it was banned by Royal decree by many kings and queens. It was a violent game in which “murder and manslaughter” were allegedly the only barriers to transporting the ball to village ends. King Henry VIII, however, is believed to have been a keen player.
6. Contrary to some beliefs, football was very much an upper class sport in England during its infancy. The rules of the game were largely drafted by students belonging to public schools and universities. The working class adopted the sport during the late 19th Century.
7. The first meeting of the Football Association on 26 October 1863 in London did not end in total agreement among the 12 attendees. One club walked out, refusing to accept the non-inclusion of hacking (kicking below the knee) among the original rules.
8. Early football tactics resembled those of today’s rugby. Teams were top-heavy with forwards and because of the offside law, which prevented advanced players touching the ball, attacking often meant players grouping or scrimmaging together around the ball to move it towards goal.
The ancient Greek “Maradona”, playing “Episkyros” with a pala (National Museum of Archeology in Athens)
9. Penalties or referees found no place in the original rules of the game. Gentlemen would never intentionally foul, it was assumed. In fact debating techniques were almost as important as ball skills in those days as players could appeal against decisions first to captains and then to umpires before referees, named so because they had originally been referred to by umpires, found their place on the pitch in 1891.
10. It was only in the 20th Century that the penalty spot was introduced. In the decade before penalties, originally called the kick of death, could be taken anywhere along a line 12-yards from goal.
11. The word soccer does not come from the United States but was a term used by public school and university students, most notably at Oxford, in the 19th Century to shorten the new game “Association Football”. The predilection to shorten words with “er” extended to Rugby too, known as rugger.
12. Many of football’s terms and expressions are of military origin: defence, back line, offside, winger, forward, attack, etc
13. The FA’s 1863 rules of the game permitted the use of handling. Although a player could not handle the ball if it was on the ground, he was able to catch it in the air and make a mark to gain a “free” kick, which opposing players were not allowed to charge down.
14. There were no David Beckhams or Roberto Carlos’ before 1927 as goals could not be scored from direct free kicks.
15. Goalkeepers, in their own half, could handle the ball both inside and outside the penalty area before 1912.
16. London’s Kensington High Street traffic lights are the inspiration for the red and yellow cards used in today’s game. English referee and then FIFA’s Head of Refereeing Ken Aston was driving through central London thinking of ways to better illustrate a caution or sending off when the change of green to yellow to red of the lights gave him the idea.
17. Before 1913 when a corner was taken, instead of deciding on an inswinger, outswinger or taking a short one, there was nothing to stop a player dribbling the ball by himself. The rules were changed after several players teed themselves up before scoring.
18. Not surprisingly with hacking only a thing of the recent past, shin pads or guards were first permitted in the rules as early as 1874. They first appeared as a cut down version of the cricket pad.
19. The first act of a goalkeeper on a Saturday morning was not always to throw open the doors of his wardrobe before selecting his mood colour that day. Back in 1909, he was given a choice of royal blue, white or scarlet. If a goalkeeper became his country’s number 1 in 1921, he wore yellow.
20. Referees attempted to catch up with play around the turn of the century decked in black trousers, blazer and bow tie!
A neuro-physiological basis for developing future skilful players
By Rick Fenoglio
Senior Lecturer in Exercise and Sport Science, Manchester Metropolitan University / Cheshire
Co-Founder: Give Us Back Our Game
The reason that most traditional football (soccer) teaching techniques and commercial coaching programmes often fail to deliver is because they are based upon outdated models of how young children actually acquire new skills.
The majority of methods used by coaches to develop football skills in our young children consist primarily of skill drills with lots repetition of the skill to be learned. Approaches such as these are based upon the notion that as a child first attempts to learn a new football skill, the body begins to lay down a neuromuscular or motor ‘pattern’ of the movement that the player can access whenever he or she plays football. The young player, in terms of skill acquisition, is viewed as a ‘motor pattern learner’ and, so the theory goes, by repeating or practising the movement or skill, the ‘pattern’ eventually becomes engrained into the player’s neuromuscular football-related arsenal of skills. Possibly, the coach may have ‘demonstrated’ the technique to be learned.
There are several problems with this very common approach. The first problem arises when the player has to use the skill in the ever-changing environment of real football play. Techniques learned by the player on their own usually do not transfer into effectiveness in matchplay or games. Why? Because, essentially, the player has to ‘re-learn’ the skill (almost from scratch) within the ever-changing context of playing the game.
Consequently, it makes you wonder whether the skill would have been better developed within the game context in the first place in order to minimise transfer time. Secondly, and perhaps most importantly, this ‘motor programme’ approach grossly underestimates the abilities of children (and their neuromuscular systems) to learn highly complex movements quickly if given the correct environment and stimuli. Furthermore, by trying to duplicate the demonstrated movements of the coach, the player-learner will be less likely to experiment and find his/her own ways of manipulating his/her body (and the ball) in order to be successful on the pitch. History shows that the best players developed their own way of playing and being skilful.
The Give Us Back Our Game approach to player development is different. The not-for-profit campaign views the player-learner as a whole child whose learning and skill acquisition comes not from repetition or mimicking a coach’s demonstration, but from ‘interacting’ and playing within adapted matchplay and games (e.g. small-sided games). Instead of a theoretical basis that has the development of ‘motor patterns’ as its goal, Give Us Back Our Game draws upon ‘constraint-led approaches’ in skill acquisition and a ‘dynamical systems’ approach to learning new tasks. These relatively modern approaches to skill acquisition and player development view young players as very highly developed, adaptable and responsive learners who are highly reactive to the changing environment and stimuli encountered during football. Real and lasting learning and skill development arises out of interaction with the game, the environment and the other players on the pitch. Stated another way, the constraints upon the player-learner are his/her own body shape and mechanics, the immediate challenges of play and the environment in which the game takes place.
As a result, these relatively modern approaches redirect the focus of player development back onto the use of play-based activities and adapted, small-sided games that most effectively and most quickly advance a player’s football development. Real and lasting football learning and skill development during play is the result. From a neurological perspective, the billions and billions of ‘neural networks’ in each young player help him or her to first analyse, and then develop, skilful solutions to the problems encountered. If the boy or girl plays enough small-sided games, the ability to the child to be a successful problem-solver on the pitch (that is, to be skilful) within the context of the game increases dramatically. Physiologically, performing successful skills in football is a highly complex task involving coordination, strength, spatial awareness, body control in the context of the immediate challenge facing the player. To young players, each of these challenges is unique and children need as much gameplay as possible to decipher situations and find solutions using their new skills their way. Hence, the dicta…let the game be the teacher and let the children play! The coach’s role is to manipulate and adapt the small-sided game so that particular skills and abilities are developed in context where players (and their neural networks) are provided with plentiful and varied opportunities to analyse, synthesise, act, react, make mistakes, try new things and have fun during football play. Several of the games and the abilities they develop can be found on www.giveusbackourgame.co.uk. The results are a more matchplay-related, faster and more robust learning of the skills needed to successfully meet the challenges that playing football offers and that young players so enjoy.
But you won’t get this by playing 7 v 7, 8 v 8 or 11 v 11 where players hardly touch the ball and play in set positions. You won’t get it in the current system because the physical requirement for young players is too high and there are too many influences distracting children from learning, such as spectators and, too often, coaches. Furthermore, studies from our Department found that in terms of number of touches of the ball, number of passes, number of shots and number of 1 v 1 encounters, 7 v 7 and 8 v 8 were very similar to 11 – a –side football. We concluded that 3 v 3, 4 v 4 and 5 v 5 were the optimal small-sided games for the 5 – 12 age groups as they combined optimal number of touches of the ball without being too strenuous (as is found in 2 v 2 or 1 v 1 football). Certainly Rinus Michels and others had no knowledge of current learning theories; they simply used commonsense to decide that smaller-sided games, and 4 v 4 in particular, were most appropriate and effective for developing good young footballers. It is only now, from current theoretical data and what we see on the pitch, that we see that the approach has too many merits to ignore. Add to this the Give Us Back Our Game demand for more ethical playing environments and more child-centred approaches and you have a solid blueprint for developing young, gifted British players. But we are already playing catch-up with other countries!
Tips for coaches:
- Use the GUBOG 80/20 rule for training and matchplay (if possible). 80% (or more) of the training time should be spent with the children playing adapted small-sided games. The remaining 20% can be used for warming-up, instruction and other fun non-football games that develop multilateral co-ordination. Small-sided games are a more effective and more matchplay-specific method for learning skills than drills. Drills are too far removed from actual play to be highly effective;
- Mistakes are good! Mistakes allow the player to recognise and, in time, discard unsuccessful strategies. Praise the bravery that goes into trying! Studies show that children either take no notice of criticism or play worse as a result;
- Evidence shows that the first coach a young player has is vital for instilling a love of the game by creating a safe, non-threatening and enjoyable environment in which children can learn. By giving some ownership of training to the boys and girls themselves and by letting them make some decisions, you foster empowerment, independent learning and their own personal love of the game;
- Training should be variable so that learners can explore and discover their own solutions to football problems. Remember that history shows that the best players developed their own way of playing skilfully and achieving success on the pitch.
- ‘Instruction’ from coaches can be used – but this should be in the form of ‘nuggets of information’ that the player can quickly and repeatedly attempt in a small-sided game.
- Demonstrate only briefly then let players experiment and try to find their own way of performing a movement or skill.
- Use guided discovery and question-and-answer techniques rather than prescriptive coaching.
- In the Give Us Back Our Game approach, coaches shape and guide rather than direct; and know that game intelligence and skill can be more quickly and more effectively developed by the use of adapted, game-related activities.
- Let the Children Play!
© Rick Fenoglio, November 2007
References:
Davids, K., Button, C. and Bennett, S., Dynamics of Skill Acquisition (2008),
Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign, Illinois. ISBN: 0736036865.
Fenoglio, R. (2005), A 4 v 4 Pilot Scheme for U9 Academy Football Players. A Research Report. In-house publication. Manchester Metropolitan University.
Verheul, M (2004) Constraints on Coordination: Intrinsic dynamics, behavioural information and asymmetry in bimanual rhythmic coordination. PhD Thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, ISBN 90-9018278-0.
Whitty, A.G., Spinks, W., Murphy, A., Watsford, M.L. & Pine, M. J. Coordination changes of a complex motor skill under differing practice conditions. The University of Technology, Sydney Australia.
Williams, A.M. & Hodges, N.J. (2005). Practice, instruction and skill acquisition: Challenging tradition. Journal of Sport Sciences, 23(6), 637-650.
COPYRIGHT 2007 Mr R Fenoglio Manchester Metropolitan University. All rights reserved.
Soccer coaching and pre-school children – what to expect
What to expect from U-6s
Coaching pre-school, (i.e., under six), children is a lot of fun!
Their enthusiasm knows no bounds, they will turn up for practice in the most severe weather conditions imaginable and they smile all the time!!
Developmentally, however, they are very different from children who are just two or three years older.
For example:
- Most of your players will cry immediately when they get hurt. Some cry even when they are not hurt,
- No matter how loud you shout, or how much they “practice” it, they can not or will not pass the football,
- Somebody will come off the field in need of a toilet. Somebody will stay on the field when they should be going to the toilet!
- The only player to hold a position is the goalkeeper (if you play with one.) Don’t even consider teaching positional play,
- Twenty seconds after the start of a game, every player will be within 5 yards of the ball.
- Several players will slap at the ball with their hands, or pick it up. Several parents will yell at them not to do that.
- A model rocket that is launched from a nearby field will get 99% of the player’s attention. By all means, stop whatever you are doing and watch for a couple of minutes.
- During a season, you will end up tying at least 40 to 50 shoelaces
- They will do something that is very funny. Make sure that you laugh.
